Bearing Fruit
(Sermon can be heard by clicking on the title)
Gate Pa- 27th Sunday of Ordinary Time
Readings:
Psalm: Psalm 19
First Reading:
Exodus 20:1-4,7-9,12-20
Second Reading:
Phil
3:4-14
Gospel:
Matthew
21:33-46
What I want to say:
This gospel reading needs to be read both in context of the
gospel, where it comes in the story and what comes before and after it, and in
the context of the time. When read in this way I wonder that the chief priests
and elders, the Jerusalem leadership heard as Jesus told this parable, until Jesus
makes it very clear what he thinks of them. And I wonder where we now stand in
the story, and what proper care of the vineyard looks like for us, and what we
as tenant farmers are to give back to the one who owns all the land? Are we
good fruit?
What I want to
happen:
I want people to reflect on the
last questions, and to grow both in their understanding of scripture, and in
what it means to be a missional community living incarnationally in our local
community.
The Sermon
1. Introduction:
Last week
we heard and focussed on Jerusalem leaderships question to Jesus
‘By what authority
do you do these things?
or – whose
yoke are you teaching?
Come after
Jesus
returned to Jerusalem for last
time (palm Sunday)
expelled dealers from temple
gone Bethany for night
returned next morning, and after
finding fig tree he’d gone to had no fruit
he
cursed it – for not having fruit
enters temple – conversation we
are in middle of begins
in response
question
Jesus –
asks first where Johns baptism came from – chose not answer
told story
two sons – one whom said no to working in vineyard and then does
others says yes, and then doesn’t
then tells
this week’s parable
next week
is parable wedding feast
all that is
in response to question
‘By what authority
do you do these things?
2. Parable of the wicked tenants
number of
layers to this story
like an onion
– or parfait if your donkey (Shrek reference)
all layers
influence how chief priests and elders
and Matthews community
heard story
Jesus has
habit telling story sucked people in
point
where feeling comfortable with what said
flips
it over
This story
like that
so what
are the layers that suck people in?
a. situation itself
is a common one –one many hearers participating in
both
tenant farmers
and
land owners
many those chief priests and
elders had acquired land over last half century from small landowners
could not pay with Roman or
temple tax
forced sell land to wealthy Jerusalem
aristocracy to pay off debts
now works on their former land
as tenants
beholden to these chief priests
and elders among others
one reasons why Jerusalem
leadership hated by rural population
resented what had happened
longed land to be returned
knew if they tried something like
what happening – not paid what owed
now
land owners hire people violently evict them and put in place new tenants
seen it
happen
gives edge
to reply offered to Jesus by chief priests and elders to his question about
what will happen to tenants after son killed
these people acted dishonourably
shamefully
not fulfilled their honour bound
commitments
brought shame on families
ð
we know how to deal with such people
brought more shame in killing
son
deserve violent end
b. – story alludes
to Isaiah 5 – well know love story
about
vineyard planted and cared for, but fruit is bad
unlike
that vineyard – fruit is good
those looking after it are bad.
allusion
to house Israel and Judah in particular
failure
bear fruit – be a blessing as God intended
c. – use vineyards also a common way talking about Israel’s
history
vineyard
Israel
tenants
– oppression under procession Imperial regimes
Egypt
Babylon
Persia
Greeks
Rome
4. Stumbling Blocks
I wonder
what chief priests and elders hearing at this point
not seem
worried
engaged –
situation know well
while troubling revolutionary
allusions
maybe
puzzled by behaviour tenants,
or generosity of land owner
seems
pretty straight forward
seem offer
response readily
maybe little hint worry
5. The Twist
Jesus has
history using these kinds stories in unpredictable ways
does so
again
Uses Psalm
118: 22-23
“The stone that the builders rejected
has now become the cornerstone.
23 This is the Lord’s doing,
and it is wonderful to see.
has now become the cornerstone.
23 This is the Lord’s doing,
and it is wonderful to see.
uses it
suggest that he – Jesus is the cornerstone that is being rejected
this cornerstone
will be their undoing
in essence
– uses it turn them into the bad tenants – hadn’t seen that one coming
“because
you yield no fruit, all will be taken away from you and given to those who will”
remember
that fig tree?
6. Danger, danger, danger.
for chief priests
and elders, indulging Pharisees –
told this is the end – from then
on plot end Jesus
do so very quickly
all this
can leaves us feeling pretty smug
as Mathews
community could well have felt as well.
so much
easier on this side of these events
when
you know the stories
so
easy see what is coming and to feel like we are on the winners side
at this
point hear robot of Lost is Space spinning around going danger, danger, danger Will
Robinson
I wonder
where we now stand in the story,
and what proper care of the vineyard
looks like for us,
and what we as tenant farmers
are to give back to the one who owns all the land?
Are we good fruit?
Comments