Who is at the gate?
Gate Pa – 26th
Sunday in Ordinary Time, 29th September 2013
Readings:
Hebrew Scripture: Jeremiah
32:1-3,6-15
Psalm: Psalm:
91:1-6, 14-16 (But Psalm 42 cos we need a good lament)
Epistle: 1 Timothy 6:6-19
Gospel: Luke 16:19-31
What I want to say:
I
want to use the story of Elizabeth of Hungary to shed light on the story of
Lazarus – how can we live out what this story is suggesting
What I want to happen:
people to talk about who is at
their/our gate, and how do we and how might we respond
The Sermon
1. Introduction:
wonder where saw yourself as you heard this story – rich man
or Lazarus
for myself interesting very poor man is named and rich man
unnamed
certainly not see self as rich
term leave people Larry Ellison, Bill Gates, Graeme Hart,
Owen Glenn, Todd Family or John Key,
in
comparison to them I am poor
know not
poor either -> a lot better off than many people in this country and
internationally
time in Solomons – uncomfortably aware that compared most
those lived among 2 ½ weeks was unbelievably wealthy
access to
wealth, food, resources and health care – they could not dream of
I am rich man in this story
left wondering who I am not seeing at my gate
what might I
do if I do see them?
2. Francis
Thursday night around world Franciscan will be celebrating Transitus
– service celebrates Francis of Assisi’s passing from this world to God
Friday we have his feast day
remember
Francis as someone who did see people at Gates
gesture of God’s
love he joined them
argue
about how helpful that is
his case his joining them made them more visible to wealthy
of his time.
he did two things that rich man in this story did not do
saw poor who
was at this gate
felt their claim
on him and he responded
3. Elizabeth of Hungary, Princess (November 19)
Another
saints remember is Elizabeth, the daughter of Andrew II of Hungary, was born at Presburg,
Hungary, in 1207. When she was four she was sent to the court of the Landgrave
of Thuringia to be betrothed to his eldest son, Louis IV, who was then ten
years of age. Although many others treated her harshly, Louis was very good to
her. When Elizabeth was fifteen, they finally married, and it proved to be a
love match. They had three children.
Elizabeth was influenced by the
Franciscans, who had recently reached Germany. She enjoyed helping the poor- spent
large sums on charitable work, funding hospitals and providing for orphans.
After seven years of very happy
life, tragedy
Louis
died suddenly of the plague while journeying to the crusades.
her
brother-in-law, upset by her extravagant generosity, took possession of her
son, the heir, and turned Elizabeth and her two daughters out of the castle
with, tradition says, a baby at her breast. They survived with great
difficulty, often having to beg for food, until some friends of Louis caused
her brother-in-law to make some small provision for her life.
eventually
- made arrangements for the care of her children and became a Franciscan
tertiary.
She
came under the authority of a harsh priest, Conrad of Marburg, who had been a
member of the Inquisition. He treated her with great severity, and under a discipline
of fasting, penances and vigils her health suffered. The last four years of her
life were spent in caring for the poor and sick in Marburg. She continued to do
this with charm and good humour despite the cruel directives of her confessor,
and she refused an invitation to return to Hungary. She was only twenty-four
when she died in 1231.
Elizabeth was buried at Marburg,
and the poor people whom she had helped came to mourn. Her contemporaries were
so moved by the story, that she was canonised only four years after she died. A
year later her body was taken from the humble grave and placed in a rich tomb
in a church which was built in her memory.
Often focus on what happens after evicted from Castle and
harsh life under Conrad of Marburg
all noble etc…
beyond most of us
miss importance of her time as princess
much more helpful for us as we respond to today’s world and
todays reading
Franciscan writer read while away, went hear last year in Wellington
-
Susan
Pitchford, in book Following Francis
describes how Elizabeth influenced by Franciscans
lost faith in complacent notion that earthly inequalities
were ordained by God
experienced needs of poor as a shameful judgement on her own
luxurious lifestyle
stunned to discover that what she was living on had been
taken away from others, particularly the poor
response was one authenticity and grace – live simply
to not add
to the poverty of others
and if she
could – address the both consequences and causes of that poverty
dressed
simply
gave
extravagantly
personally
cared for poorest lepers and beggars
refused
wear crown church – annoyed mother in law
scandalised
maids by joining them in household chores and asking them call her by first
name
when learnt food served came two
sources – food grown on property and food extorted from poor surrounding area –
confined eating what she knew came from own property
in way rich man in our story today did not
felt claim of poor of the world on her
sought to
live in way – did not add to their poverty
-
alleviated
consequences of that poverty
-
addressed
some of cause of their poverty
-
central
to all this recognising risen Christ in face poor.
4. Questions
Her story and story told by Jesus raises some questions for
me
who do we
see at our gates?
how do we or
might we live in way does not add to their poverty?
how do we or
might we work to address the consequences and causes of that poverty?
Comments